Apple's rumored 'Replay' service a ways off

Apple's rumored 'Replay' service a ways off
The rumors from last week about Apple being "on the edge" of launching a cloud movie service, which would enable iTunes users to stream movies from Apple's servers and then re-download them to other devices, are at best premature. Apple has yet to sign cloud agreements for feature films with at least four of the top six film studios, according to multiple film industry sources who spoke to CNET. Apple has indeed pursued such agreements, which CNET reported in May, but Apple's negotiations could drag on for months before the company acquires cloud rights from all six film studios, the sources said. A launch is not imminent, the sources said. Cloud computing is the term used to describe when a person performs computing chores on some third party's servers instead of their own PC. The cloud supposedly represents the next generation of media management and many consumers as well as studio executives are eagerly waiting to see what Apple can do with its cloud. Apple has announced that a cloud service is coming for music and last week rolled out an offering that enables iTunes users to re-download TV shows. But a cloud service for films is going to be a tougher nut to crack for Apple. Here's why: Related links• Apple still trying to land films, TV shows for iCloud• HBO likely to clear way for cloud video, UltraViolet• Is UltraViolet on track with effort to seed cloud?One reason is the HBO window. During specific periods of time--often referred to in the film industry as windows--HBO owns the exclusive electronic distribution rights of films from three of the six top films studios: 20th Century Fox, Universal, and Warner Bros. Any retailer that wishes to sell physical DVDs from these studios during HBO's window is totally unrestricted. But online retailers are legallyprevented from delivering movie downloadsfrom the three HBO-restricted studios during HBO's window and they also can't stream titles from those studios. This means that right now iTunes can't stream a movie to a customer during the HBO window that the customer may have purchased outside of the window. Not only are these agreements one reason for the hold up to the roll out of Apple's cloud-movie service, but they are also a roadblock for UltraViolet, a cloud platform backed by all of the large studios with the exception of Disney. In addition, while Apple has discussed different video-on-demand deals with the studios, there's no truth to another rumor that floated around last week about agreements Apple had in place to create a subscription film service to rival Netflix, according to industry insiders. Will Disney license Apple's movie cloud? The company enjoys a cozy relationship with Apple's CEO and is one of the studios not restricted by an exclusive HBO distribution deal.Greg Sandoval/CNETThe main takeaway from all this is that one of the most powerful people in cloud video now is Jeff Bewkes, CEO of Time Warner, the media conglomerate and parent company of HBO, Warner Bros. Studios and CNN. HBO is not blocking the streaming delivery of films with the intent to prevent customers from acquiring legally purchased moves, according to multiple industry insiders. HBO is trying to cover its backside. The company entered into electronic-distribution agreements with Fox, Universal, and Warner long before cloud-video services came along. The contracts are tricky and complex, and HBO doesn't want to give up certain rights without making sure it won't put the company at a disadvantage later on. The sources say that one scenario HBO wants to avoid is allowing services to stream movies purchased on a pay-per-view basis during the HBO window and then deciding later to switch and sell films on a subscription basis. A rival could conceivably use a relaxed HBO window to offer older titles from NBC, Fox and Warner for less money than what HBO charges and compete with HBO. Click on photo to read 'Why Time Warner rules the cloud."Greg Sandoval/CNETThese are just some of HBO's concerns, but regardless, the word going around is that Time Warner and Bewkes are committed to cloud distribution and to getting a deal done. They are close to a final agreement with at least one of the studios that would allow it to sell streaming rights during the HBO window. (Grain of salt time: I was told last spring that a deal would get done by mid summer.)So, for Apple and the company's quest to acquire cloud-streaming rights, the chances look good, but it's going to take some time. As for the studios not covered by an exclusive HBO distribution agreement, it's unclear where they stand but sources said that Apple doesn't have agreements in place with all of these studios either. Apple CEO Steve Jobs is the largest individual Disney shareholder so that would appear to be a slam dunk. Sony Pictures is a big booster of cloud distribution and and of UltraViolet, so that studio seems a likely Apple partner. As for Paramount, the studio's parent company, Viacom, seems more bullish on digital distribution than ever. With Google, Hulu, Amazon, Apple and Netflix competing in the streaming-video business, they are helping to bid up content prices. Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman remarked on that last week following the company's earnings report and added that traditional movie distributors, such as cable and satellite operators, are also looking to acquire Web rights. So maybe the message from Hollywood is that regardless of who's distributing video over the Web, if you want content you had better be prepared to pay because if you don't someone else will.


Next Issue magazine app lands on iPad

Next Issue magazine app lands on iPad
Earlier this year, Next Issue Media introduced a unique approach that could revolutionize the way digital magazines are sold. In what has been referenced as a Netflix-for-magazines-like scheme, tablet owners can essentially pay $10-$14 a month for all the magazines that they want to read -- not just one title but any of the "premiere" titles from the likes of Conde Nast, Time Inc,. and Hearst.Initially, the platform has only been available for Android tablets running Honeycomb. CEO Morgan Guenther noted in an interview last week that the service already has approximately 40,000 accounts signed up at highest level with 12,000 active users.But now, Next Issue is taking things to the next level with the introduction of its app on the iPad, with 39 titles ready immediately and more promised to be added to the library later this year. Some examples already in the catalog include Bon Appétit, Golf Digest, GQ, Vogue and Wired. For reference, here's how the pricing scale breaks down: Unlimited Basic: Includes titles published monthly and bi-weekly, including back issues, for $9.99 per monthUnlimited Premium: Includes all titles in the catalog, including weeklies, and back issues, such as Entertainment Weekly, People, Sports Illustrated, The New Yorker, TIME for $14.99 per month Individual magazine subscriptions range from $1.99 to $9.99 per monthIndividual magazine issues are available from $2.49 to $5.99 per issue When asked about potential competitors in the digital magazine space such as Zinio or even Apple's Newsstand, Guenther reiterated that Next Issue is really alone in the market in terms of what it offers. "We're happy to have consumers discover digital magazines through one-click on iTunes," Guenther commented. "It helps to drive more adoption. It's just a different path. I don't see any channel conflict within the Apple environment or the Google Play environment." Guenther compared Next Issue and Zinio to on-demand services versus traditional cable packages.With Zinio, there are thousands of titles available from all over the world, but Next Issue is only focusing on some of the most popular weekly and monthly glossies. Nevertheless, Guenther did reveal that Next Issue is plotting to expand its library with more international titles, starting with adding more English-language magazines first. Other goals for this year and next include add more social and personalization elements as well as added support for Windows 8.Next Issue for iPad is available now in the United States with support for all iPad models. 30-day free trials are also available for all subscription plans.


Budget shopping tips- Desktop computers

Budget shopping tips: Desktop computers
Beware the NettopWe've seen various definitions for "Nettop."Our own Erica Ogg defined them as all-in-ones with Intel's Atom CPU, the chip family common to many Netbooks. We've also seen small, screenless systems like Asus' Eee Box, and the Acer Revo called Nettops. The common thread seems to be that, like Netbooks, Nettops use a low-cost, low-power CPU; among them the Intel Atom, the Via Nano (which we have yet to see outside of a Netbook), or AMD's Athlon 2650e.What we're certain of is that every system we'd call a Nettop has turned in abysmal performance in the CNET Lab. We're not talking about 3D gaming performance, which we don't even bother testing at this level. We mean everyday slow. "About 15 minutes to convert a single CD into iTunes" slow. We prefer "Nyet-top"The common excuse for this performance is that Nettops are only supposed to work as a dedicated Internet PCs. You might expect such a system would offer a huge price break from a real desktop then. Not true. The Asus Eee Box, for example, cost $350 when it came out last year. For just $50 more, you could have purchased an eMachines T5274 midtower, which was four to five times faster than the Eee Box.For a more recent example, we just finished testing eMachines' new EL1300G-01w (review up soon), which goes for $299. This system also uses the AMD Athlon 2650e chip, which gets you the same snail's-pace performance as the Eee Box. And also as with the Eee Box, for $50 or $100 more than the EL1300g-01w, you can find much faster desktops using Intel Dual Core or AMD Athlon X2 chips, such as eMachines' own $350 ET1161-07.Dell's Studio One 19: not a Nettop.Sarah Tew/CNETAll-in-one Nettops need hate, tooStandalone Nettops aren't alone in offering poor performance with little cost benefit. Averatec's and MSI's 18.4-inch all-in-one Nettops offer the same slow Atom CPUs for $549 and $599, respectively. Those prices might seem pretty good for all-in-ones with such large screens, but take a look atthe Dell Studio One 19. Our review of that Dell system covered a $1,000-plus configuration with a 18.5-inch screen and a 2.5GHz Intel Core 2 Duo E5200 chip, but the Studio One 19 starts at $699. At that price you get the same fast CPU and the same display as our review unit, for just $100 to $150 more than the dog-slow all-in-one Nettops.We'll agree that for many people, $150 or $100 is not insignificant. And if all you want is a working computer for the lowest price, a Nettop will do the job. But please free yourself from any illusion that a Nettop offers a good deal. We'd also urge those who can to spend just a little bit extra on a real desktop, which offers the performance, and therefore time savings, to quickly offset the added cost.